about Frank Gehry

New World Center

No Comments
Architect:
Location:
Tags:
Posted April 18, 2016

IAC Building

No Comments
Architect:
Location:
Tags:
Posted April 18, 2016

Millenium Park, Jay Pritzker Pavilion, Crown Fountain, Cloud Gate

No Comments
Architect: , ,
Location:
Tags: , , , ,
Posted March 8, 2013

Art Gallery of Ontario

No Comments
Architect: ,
Location:
Tags:
Posted November 21, 2012

What does the AIA Twenty-five Year Award say about our values as architects?

Reflecting on the past two winners of the AIA Twenty-five Year Award, I am moved to ask what this award says about our values as architects. This is supposed to be the quintessential award that says a building is cool and has stood the test of time as an embodiment of architectural excellence. The winner must demonstrate excellence “in function, in execution of original program, and in creativity of statement by today’s standards.”

Frank Gehry Residence

If we look at the Frank Gehry Residence, the 2012 award winner, I’d say what we really value as architects is novelty, weirdness, and idiosyncrasy. Gehry’s house is amazing when it comes to these values. But is this the core heart and soul of what we’re about? It is also a single-family home for the architect himself? Is this what is really valuable about architecture—our own self-indulgence? This is not a house that even 1 percent of the populace would relate to or understand.

John Hancock Tower

The John Hancock Tower, the 2011 winner, is a beautiful building. But this is also the building where all the glass fell out. Excavation problems undermined the foundation of neighboring Trinity Church, requiring a huge restoration. The John Hancock Building, in its totality, does not demonstrate excellence. It had some real problems! Furthermore, the resolution was sealed by the courts; as a profession we are left with major questions and bad memories.

I’m a real architecture junkie; I travel a lot to see buildings. I am constantly dismayed by disappointing failures of buildings that the media has hyped. It crushes me–hurts me to the core of my being–to find that what has been called great architecture has feet of clay.

Other buildings I visit and find amazing! They’re supporting a beautiful life, are beloved in their communities, and are making a palpable contribution to the world. I recently talked with a woman who had visited the Kimbell Art Museum with a fellow she had just begun to date. The experience of being at the Kimbell bumped their romance to another level. It illuminated a connection of their souls! This building got the Twenty-five Year Award, and it deserved it.

AIA Twenty-Five Year Award | Texas Architect

I believe submissions to this program need to articulate the contribution the building has made over 25 years. How has it enhanced the community, or become a beloved icon? How has it provoked a redevelopment in its neighborhood? How is it sustainable? We profess these as values and say that the 25-year Award must live up to “today’s standards.” Are these really standards we believe in?

There is a difference between a building that makes a huge contribution and one that’s interesting to the architectural subculture. We, as architects, need to talk about this.

2 Comments
Thinking about Life as an Architect
Architect: , ,
Location: , ,
Tags:
Posted April 24, 2012

Weiseman Art Museum

No Comments
Architect:
Location:
Tags:
Posted July 6, 2011

DG Bank

No Comments
Architect:
Location:
Tags: , , , ,
Posted July 5, 2011

Dancing House

No Comments
Architect:
Location:
Tags: ,
Posted July 5, 2011

Guggenheim Museum Bilbao

No Comments
Architect:
Location:
Tags:
Posted July 5, 2011

American Center

No Comments
Architect:
Location:
Tags:
Posted July 5, 2011